The Need for Stricter Gun Laws in Micheal Gawendas Book, ...

In this expository article. â€Å"Americas lethal affair with the gun†, dated Februrary 6th, 2006, Micheal Gawenda contend s that America needs to be stricter on gun control laws. Gawenda, from The Age, writes the article with tones of dissension and assetiveness, but in a calm controlled way of approach. The intended audience of the article are the readers of The Age, as that is the source. Gawenda firmly believes that gun control laws in America are not strict enough, to persuade his readers, he uses a variety of persuasive devices, some used repetitively throughout the article. One persuasive device majority of the expository, was statistics. Throughout most paragraphs, the text includes the persuasive technique of statistics, for†¦show more content†¦Gawenda liked to include humour in his article, so besides having irony, he also had analogy. This was present at only one time, but it seem It was more than enough to persuade his readers. Gawenda critisises, writing â€Å"-and getting a gun permit in Virginia is about as easy as getting a library card.† hearing this provokes the readers to have an angry response. It giving them an example of just how much stricter laws are needed, if this is the comparison given- getting a library card. Readers become irate to hear the fact that most people can get hold of a gun. There were also appeals to readers invol ved in the article, including appeal to consequence, appeal to fear/security, appeal to humanity and appeal to paternalism. Gawenda cunningly adds each in the right times. Appeal to consequence is used in reflection of the whole article, it is the Gawenda implying that if the laws in America for gun control are not made stricter, it will affect you and those around you, that people are dying everyday anf that it will continue, that is also a part of humanity, to feel empathy

Steroids Should Not Be Banned - 1316 Words

Steroids have been around the athletic programs for years and the most testing has come out to spot this type of cheating in order to make playing sports fair. Society has become very lazy over the years and building up hard work has been taking for granted and a lot of people these days spend more time trying to cheat than making the effort to stay steady at the gym and achieve perfection correctly. Effects on steroids come with the good and bad just like everything that is added to the body. When athlete’s get caught use these types of drugs there are some very heavy penalties that can cause an athlete the entire season and if a player misses a season in any sports that experience lost as well as a career tainted by a cheating scandal. â€Å"David Howman, the director general of the World Anti-Doping Agency, and Travis Tygart, the CEO of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, said they were confident of U.S. government cooperation, based on past experience, including the BALCO doping case (Patrick).† The BALCO scandal was one of the biggest bust in sports that brought down huge athletes names like Barry Bond, Alex Rodriguez, Roger Clemens and Adrian Beltre. These athletes are and were the best in the sport at their prime, which raised question did the steroids play a major part in their success. A lot of these athletes played the Major Baseball League and it has led this twentieth century of that sports to be called the steroid era. Steroids can make a person get extremely big or buildShow MoreRelatedShould Steroids Be Banned?534 Words   |  2 PagesThe third argument presented is that even if steroids are banned, they should not be banned from sports because there are a multitude of other risks already associated with sports, and steroids increase competition. Just last year, a media car ran Johnny Hoogerland off the road during the Tour de France, sending him headlong into barbed wire. Redskins quarterback Joe Theismann famously had his leg broken and career ended mid-game, and the devastating long term effects of concussions are rapidlyRead MoreSteroids Should Not Be Banned1631 Words   |  7 Pagesfan’s face into the concrete This all happened because the football player was taking steroids. People say steroids are not dangerous but they are very dangerous because steroids can damage the person and their body, are also very addicting, and also ruin your sporting careers. Terms associated with steroids are stacking and cycling. Some users combine several different types of steroids or add other steroids or nonsteroidal supplements in an attempt to make them big which is known as stacking (Arnold)Read MoreSteroids Should Not Be Banned2093 Words   |  9 PagesSteroids By: Taci Miller For many years people have debated whether not to have steroids in sports, or to keep them away from all competition. However some athletes use steroids anyway to â€Å"get ahead† of the competition. These action can cause athletes being kicked out of a game or even all future competition. Some people ask â€Å"Why use steroids?† Some athletes use drugs, where they can train their bodies hard and then have their bodies recover fast. Different types of athletes use steroids in differentRead MoreAnabolic Steroids Should Be Banned1348 Words   |  6 PagesSteroids, more specifically anabolic steroids, are drugs that can be legally prescribed or taken illegally, to boost strength and increase athletic performance. They are based off of the hormone testosterone. On the street where the drug is sold illegally, the common slang names are â€Å"arnolds†, â€Å"gym candy†, â€Å"pumpers†, â€Å"roids†, â€Å"stackers†, â€Å"weight trainersà ¢â‚¬ , and â€Å"juice†. Steroids have a long, long history, especially in regards to sporting events. Anabolic steroids were not really used worldwide untilRead MoreSteroids Should Not Be Banned1857 Words   |  8 Pagesnot count if there is no way to get caught. For example, if an athlete uses steroids to enhance their performance but does not get caught then it is not considered cheating at all. This topic of cheating and the use of steroids can be linked together because steroids help a person â€Å"cheat† on their performance abilities and physique, specifically for athletes of modern day. There has been an increase of the use of steroids in order to enhance the performance of many athletes and including some putRead MoreSteroids Should Not Be Banned Essay1611 Words   |  7 PagesSteroids are a Schedule III controlled substance in the U.S. and are illegal to own or use without a prescription from a doctor. Banned in almost all athletic competitions and sports because they work so well, but are dangerous in large quantities as anything else is. More properly known as anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) and are synthetic derivatives of testosterone, that behave like male sex hormones. They include hormones, alkaloids, and vitamins. Steroids can be taken three different ways;Read MoreSteroid Use Sports : Steroids Should Not Be Banned2008 Words   |  9 PagesSteroid use in sports When it comes to the topic of steroid use in sports, some of us will agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this argument usually ends, however, is on the question of whether or not it is cheating to use steroids while in a sport. Whereas some are convinced that it is not cheating due to the benefits it provides towards muscle growth and repair, others maintain their belief that it is a form of cheating because of the regulations that have been acted upon it. I agree thatRead MoreAnabolic Steroids Should Be Banned844 Words   |  4 PagesAnabolic Steroids are used to decrease inflammation and reducing the activity of the immune system. Steroid drugs are a class of synthetic compounds that act to mimic hormones that occur naturally within the human body. There are three types of steroids anabolic, androgenic and corticosteroids. Androgenic steroids and corticosteroids are used to treat many medical conditions. Anabolic steroids can also be used to treat medical conditions but thos e are also the kind that are often abused by some athletesRead MoreAnabolic Steroids Should Be Banned Essay1118 Words   |  5 PagesAn anabolic steroid is a synthetic steroid hormone that resembles testosterone in promoting the growth of muscle (NIDA 2004). Anabolic Steroids are taken by many athletes, whether male or female and can harm the body. There are many anabolic, androgenic effects, and risks. When you continue to negatively use this kind of drug to succeed life threatening consequences come into effect. ..(needs more context ) â€Æ' Introduction In many states and surrounding countries athletes are using what are labeledRead MoreAnabolic Steroids Should Be Banned Essay1814 Words   |  8 PagesFor years, anabolic steroids have been used by competitive athletes have used to improve performance through muscular size or strength, and by noncompetitive weight trainers for purely cosmetic physique enhancement. In the vast majority of cases, users of that have taken steroids for prolonged periods have reported considerable gains in physical size and strength. However, a large number of side effects and health risks have been linked to extended use of anabolic steroids. Research has indicated

Conflict in romeo and Juliet free essay sample

What is meant by conflict? The dictionary defines conflict as a struggle to resist or overcome; contest of opposing forces or powers; strife; battle, antagonism. No matter how hard one tries to avoid it, conflict enters our lives. All drama involves conflict, without conflict there is no drama! Different forms of conflict exist, usually either, man versus himself, man verses man or man verses nature. Every story should have conflict on at least one of these levels, as conflict brings the plot to life keeping the audience hooked. Characters need to go through conflict, before there can be a happy ending or the happy ending wont mean anything. The central conflict in Romeo and Juliet is the feud between the Montagues and the Capulets. Members of each family hate, insult and fight each other, even the household staff become caught up in this rivalry. Shakespheres Romeo and Juliet is essentially known as love story, although, it is entwined with different types of conflict, and this is what I will be examining throughout this essay. The Prologue is a fourteen line sonnet and would have been read to the audience providing an introduction to the play. The Prologue does appear to have a deeper, more important function, as it does not merely set the scene of Romeo and Juliet; it tells the audience exactly what is going to happen. The Prologue refers to a pair of star-crossd lovers, which means, literally, against the stars. In Elizabethan times, stars were thought to control peoples destinies. The Prologue itself creates this sense of fate providing the audience with the knowledge that Romeo and Juliet will die even before the play has started, and also that their tragic deaths end their parents feud. Doth with their death bury their parents strife. Shakespeare uses this technique called dramatic irony throughout the play, it enables the audience to watch the play with expectation and sense the tension. The Prologue also reveals themes and imagery to bring the themes to life, such as, love, conflict, time, fate, life, death and power. It begins with the word Two, and just in those 14 lines there are seven examples of the word two, emphasizing two sides of conflict. Shakespeares use of oxymorons or contradictory word pairs throughout the play also accentuates conflict of two sides, Montagues versus Capulets, love versus hate. The first oxymoron is found in the Prologue, From forth the fatal loins of these two foes, a pair of star-crossd lovers take their life where fatal means death and loins depicts birth, suggesting that the children of these mortal enemies were destined to die. Romeos opening speech contains nine oxymorons, which again emphasizes opposing forces, he talks about his love for Rosaline, how love and hate have become mixed together, conjuring up images of chaos and confusion. He describes his state of mind through this series of oxymorons, Feather of lead, bright smoke, cold fire, sick health (1:1:171). It appears to be a statement that he is ready to be in love rather than actual love. The Princes closing speech also contains an oxymoron glooming peace (5:3:309). It is a sad kind of peace, sad because Romeo and Juliet have taken their own lives, but peaceful, as it is the end of the feud. These oxymorons serve to reinforce the major theme of conflict. As the audience is led through the opening scene, it is exposed to the depths and severity of the feud between the Capulets and Montagues. Shakespeare initiates using the technique, word-play with banter between Sampson and Gregory. They state crude, sexual innuendos about conquering Montague men and women. The sexual punning continues throughout the play, contrasting to the lyrical imagery used later by Romeo and Juliet to express their love. The servants references to tool and naked weapon, together with repeated images of striking and thrusting, illustrate how images of love and sex are intertwined with violence and death. The sudden switch from comical banter between servants to sudden possible death demonstrates the fast changing pace that drives the action within the play. Almost immediately, swords are drawn in order to bring the audience into the plot and capture attention. It becomes evident from the start that the feud involves the servants as well as their masters. Gregory tells Sampson, Draw thy tool. Here comes two of the house of Montagues (1:1: 31-28). The use of swordplay and its dramatic effect reminds the audience of the theme of conflict. The fight starts with Samson insulting the Montagues, I will bite my thumb at them (1:1:35). This act represents the foolishness of the entire Capulet/Montague feud. As each character is introduced, the differences in temperament become apparent, Benvolio, means good will, and is represented as a peace maker, I do but keep the peace (1:1:59). Tybalt, as hot tempered and aggressive: What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word. As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee (1:1:61). These are strong words, revealing the strength of the hatred and the seriousness of the feud. Even the older men want to get involved in the brawl. Lord Capulet tries to join in the sword play, Give me my long sword, ho! (1:1:66) Lady Capulet mocks her husbands eagerness, A crutch, a crutch, why call you for a sword? (1:1:67) creating a certain tension between the Capulets. The Prince is furious, hear the sentence of your moved Prince (1:1:79), his sentence is death. He states that there have been three foolish brawls, three civil brawls, bred of an airy word (1:1:80). The people of Verona are tired of the fighting, even suggesting getting out their own weapons to stop the fighting. The Audience at this point are left in acute suspense on what is going to happen next. Act 3, Scene 1, begins with two contrasting characters, Benvolio, the peace maker, and Mercutio, whose name reflects his mercurial nature, quick tempered. It is clear that he is in the mood for a fight and Benvolio is actively trying to avoid one. If we meet, we shall not escape a brawl (3:1:3). Both Tybalt and Mercutio are portrayed as powerful characters and when Tybalt asks for a word, Mercutio replies, make it a word and a blow, (3:1:35), already provoking Tybalt. Tybalt tries to provoke Romeo, thou art a villain (3:1:54). Romeo does not want to fight and Shakespeare uses dramatic irony here, the audience knows, he has just married Tybalts cousin, Juliet, creating a sense of tension. The Elizabethan society believed that a man too much in love lost his manliness. Romeo clearly states this, thy beauty hath made me effeminate (3:1:105). Once again, this statement can be seen as a conflict of emotions, between the world of love and the public world of honor, duty, and friendship. The sudden, fatal violence in this scene, as well as the buildup to the fighting, remind the audience that for all its emphasis on love, beauty, and romance, Romeo and Juliet takes place in Elizabethan times, which is predominantly a masculine world. Notions of honor, pride, and status are destined to erupt in a fury of conflict. The viciousness and danger is a dramatic tool that Shakespeare uses to make the lovers romance seem even more precious and fragile. The fights between Mercutio and Tybalt and then between Romeo and Tybalt are chaotic; Tybalt kills Mercutio under Romeos arm. The audience feels sadness when Mercutio dies, it seems that Tybalt was quite underhand. I personally do not blame any character for his death, they all played their part. Shakespeare uses a play on words after Mercutio is stabbed, you shall find me a grave man. (3:1:90) Mercutio knows he is dying, but continues to pun jokingly, he curses the Montagues and Capulets, speaking three times about a plague on both houses. This in Elizabethan times would have meant the black death which would have most certainly been used to shock the audience. Romeo wants revenge claiming Mercutios soul is but a little way above our heads. (3:1:18) meaning that one of them is going to die. Shakespeare uses the language of revenge tragedy, whereby the main character is the revenger. Mercutio appears to see people as the cause of his death, not fate. Whereas, Romeo blames fate, for him being banished after killing Tybalt. Romeos cry, O, I am fortunes fool! (3:1:127), refers to the fact that it is written in the stars, he believes that what is happening is beyond his control, reminding the audience again of the sense of fate that hangs over the play. Lady Capulet continues the theme of violence demanding that Romeo be put to death in punishment. Act 3, Scene 5, also conveys conflict, but different from the previous scenes. The conflict here is emotional conflict, between light and dark, day and night. It is contrary to normal, as light would normally be positive, here it brings sorrow. More light and light; more dark and dark our woes! (3:5:36). Juliet claims the lark is a nightingale, wanting it to still be night. Romeo playfully argues with her stating that it was in fact the lark. She eventually realizes that Romeo must leave and as Romeo bids farewell to Juliet, the lovers experience visions that blatantly foreshadow the end of the play. This is to be the last moment they spend alive in each others company. When Juliet next sees Romeo he will be dead, and as she looks out of her window she seems to see him dead already: O God, I have an ill-divining soul! Methinks I see thee, now thou art so low, as one dead in the bottom of a tomb. Again, suggesting their fate. In the confrontation with her parents after Romeos departure, Juliet shows her maturity. She dominates the conversation with her mother, who has no idea that Juliet is proclaiming her love for Romeo whilst saying the opposite. Shakespeare here uses a technique called quibble, Indeed, I shall never be satisfied with Romeo, till I behold him-dead-is my poor heart. (3:5:94). Lady Capulet believes that she is upset because of the death of Tybalt. Yet let me weep for such a feeling loss, (3:5:74). Again, another example of dramatic irony, the audience knows she is talking about Romeo and not Tybalt, adding to the dramatic effect. In this scene Juliet uses ten double meanings, providing an understanding of language. When she first sees her mother, Juliet says, Madam, I am not well (3:5:68). Again, Lady Capulet presumes she is upset about Tybalt, but Juliet is talking about Romeo. Conflict of interest and between parent and child is also apparent in this scene when Juliet is told that she must marry Paris and she does not want to. When Lord Capulet enters the room he hears Juliet crying and one imagines his tone of voice to be that of fatherly concern, How now! A conduit, girl? What, still in tears? (3:5:129), assuming her tears are for Tybalt. When he hears that Juliet does not want to marry Paris, Lord Capulet is furious, hang, beg, starve, die in the streets, Ill neer acknowledge you (3:5:192). His words provide an image of a storm, one minute calm, the next exploding. His threat would have been very frightening to the audience; they would have empathized with Juliet. Even though Juliet tries to defy her father, she is still a woman in a male-dominated world. One might think that Juliet should just take her father up on his offer to disown her and go to live with Romeo. That is not an option. Juliet lived in a Patriarchal Society and, as a woman, cannot leave; her father has the right to make her do as he wishes. The nurse attempts to defend Juliet, Lord Capulet responds with cruel, sarcastic comments, indicating conflict between the nurse and Lord Capulet. Even Lady Capulet tries to calm her husband, You are too hot (3:5:175) but, she will not speak to Juliet. Again emotional conflict is evident as she is already married to Romeo, she is torn between Romeo and her family. When the nurse also agrees that she should marry Paris, Juliet is sarcastic towards her, thou hast comforted me marvelous much (3:5:230) and feels that the nurse has betrayed her, again demonstrating conflict between Juliet and the nurse. The play has many examples of different types of conflict, the feud between the Capulets and the Montagues is at the centre of most of it. The heavy use of swordplay throughout communicates the dominant theme of conflict. The love of Romeo and Juliet is set within the context of hatred, generated by the feud, although deep, passionate and more powerful than death itself. Romeos struggles with Tybalt, Mercutio fighting with Tybalt and Juliets nurse are all examples of conflict. The conflict of light and dark, day and night, darkness stands for death, violence and tragedy, whereas images of light reflect love, life and hope. Inner conflict, emotional conflict and love and hate conflict is seen throughout the play, mostly with Romeo, between the world of love and the public world of honor, duty, and friendship. Juliet also demonstrates inner, emotional conflict with her nurse and father. Lord Capulet shows a conflict of interest by insulting Juliet and her nurse. Shakespeare uses techniques, such as oxymorons, to enhance conflict throughout the play. Not just in Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet, but in all scripts even today, conflict is an essential ingredient, it adds tension, enabling sad and happy moments. Without conflict, the script would be boring, uninteresting and virtually pointless. It serves to leave the audience interested and wondering what will happen next and this is certainly evident in Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeares use of stagecraft and language brings the story to life; each character is distinctive and memorable, revealing the conflict and turmoil of emotions experienced by Romeo and Juliet and evoking moods of violence, tenderness, humour, passion and terror.